Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York Abstract 21579 (T. D. 29906).
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge
Certain bromides were imported under a bill of lading dated at Plamburg, April 7, 1906. Based upon the bill of lading, a pro forma invoice for the goods, dated April 7, 1906, at a valuation of 100 marks per 100 kilos, was given by the importers. The appraiser passed the invoice by adding 50 marks per 100 kilos to the invoice price, it appearing that the market price for such goods had been advanced April 5, 1906, from 100 marks to 150 marks per 100 kilos.
The importers obtaining later information that the goods were in. fact shipped from Berlin or from the factory on the 31st of March,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Almy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Forman v. PeasleeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1857
- Gibb v. WashingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1858
- Hutton v. SchellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1868
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. S. Shamash & Sons, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1954
- Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
- Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Avakian Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Avakian Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.