Legal Opinion

Walter v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 21, 1950No. 7867; Entry Nos. WH 1603; CE 3186; CE 3187PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eicwall, Judge:

These cases, which have been consolidated, involve the dutiable value of jute and wool hooked rugs from China. The question before the court is what constitutes the “time of exportation” of the merchandise to the United States, under section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, which defines export value. Counsel have agreed that if the court decides that the time of exportation is 1941, the entered values are correct, but if such time of exportation is found to be 1946, the appraised values are correct. The appraiser adopted the latter date as the basis for his finding of export…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Irvine v. RedfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API