Legal Opinion

D. N. & E. Walter & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 8, 1955No. 4776Published

1Opinion of the CourtCole, Judge

Appellant imported a quantity of jute and wool hooked rugs from China, the merchandise being entered in three shipments at the port of San Francisco in April and May of 1946. The' proper basis for appiaisement, concededly export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1980,1 was adopted by the appraiser and, predicated on a timé of exportation from China in 1946, the imported rugs were valued. The importer agreed that export value was the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, but did not agree with the appraiser’s determination that “the time of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sampson v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  2. Forman v. PeasleeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire · 1857
  3. Irvine v. RedfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Walter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API