Legal Opinion

Piecuch v. City of Manchester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1974No. 6434PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Plaintiffs brought this bill in equity against the city of Manchester and the Imperial Car Wash, Inc. They alleged that under the Manchester zoning ordinance, adopted January 5, 1965, the Manchester building superintendent improperly granted a permit to Imperial Car Wash, Inc. to erect and operate a car wash and that the zoning board of adjustment improperly refused to reverse his decision. Plaintiffs further alleged that the operation of a car wash by Imperial Car Wash, Inc. constitutes a nuisance and that its operation should be enjoined. Trial by the Court (Johnson, J.) resulted in a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Arsenault v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  2. Plymouth School District v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  3. Carter v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Robie v. LillisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Janigian v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. DaigleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  2. Hancock v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. State v. StilesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  4. Treisman v. KamenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  5. State v. PowellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API