Legal Opinion

Carter v. City of Nashua

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 31, 1973No. 6634PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Appeal to the superior court under RSA 31:74-87 by approximately 700 plaintiffs from a 3-2 decision of the Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment granting, to the defendants J. Kendall Bancroft, owner, and Yankee Greyhound Racing, Inc., by Joseph Carney, option holder, a variance of the use regulations in a light industrial district for the purpose of operating a track for dog races under the supervision of the State greyhound racing commission. RSA ch. 284 (Supp. 1972).

Prior to trial, 29 additional citizens of Nashua residing in the vicinity of the proposed dog track moved to be joined as…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. DeSimone v. Greater Englewood Housing Corp. No. 1Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Luery v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  3. Vlahos Realty Co. v. Little Boar's Head DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
  4. Colonial Beacon Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  5. R. A. Vachon & Son, Inc. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mountain Valley Mall Associates v. Municipality of ConwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  2. Nageotte v. Board of Supervisors of King George CountySupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  3. Alexander v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 17 OF THURSTON CTY.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Union Leader Corp. v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. Lambert v. Belknap County ConventionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API