Legal Opinion

Hancock v. City of Concord

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 28, 1974No. 6705PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

The sole issue to be decided is whether nonabutters have a right to be heard at a hearing before the Concord Planning Board concerning an application for subdivision under RSA 36:23. On May 1, 1972, the planning board approved subdivision of a 2.7-acre tract owned by Edward J. Sylvia, Jr. Plaintiffs sought and were granted certiorari by the superior court pursuant to RSA 36:34. Upon submission of the case on an agreed statement of facts, the trial court set aside the decision of the planning board and remanded the matter to the board for a full and complete hearing, ordering that plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Circle Lounge & Grille, Inc. v. Board of AppealMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Arsenault v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  4. Plymouth School District v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972
  5. Blevens v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Weeks Restaurant Corp. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Evans v. BurrussCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Town of North Hampton v. SandersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Carter v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API