Legal Opinion

Hickenbottom v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1971No. 5410PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This is a petition to review 1 a determination of the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board (hereinafter called the Board) disqualifying petitioner from receiving unemployment benefits under the District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Act 2 (hereinafter called the Act) for a period of 5 weeks. The appeals examiner concluded (1) that petitioner left work without permission of his supervisor; (2) that the employer w'as justified in requiring the petitioner, three days after he left work with a toothache, to produce proof of his inability to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Gregory v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Woodridge Nursery School v. JessupDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Allentuck v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage & Industrial Safety BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Washington Times v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Colton v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Cruz v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Jones v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API