Legal Opinion

Farley v. Reindollar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1917No. S. F. No. 7143Published

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

Upon petition for rehearing respondent urges that this court failed to apprehend and so to discuss and to decide the principal proposition upon which he relies, and there is merit in respondent's contention. Respondent's position as it now appears is that protests were filed before the eleventh day of July, 1911, but that the time for filing protests did not expire until July 13, 1911; nevertheless that on the eleventh day of July, before the expiration of the time within which protests might be filed, the city council took up the matter of the protests already filed and continued and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. O'Dea v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Haughawout v. RaymondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API