Legal Opinion

State v. Holleman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This is a companion case to State v. Holleman, decided this date, 225 Or 1, 357 P2d 262.

The facts are generally the same as those in the companion case, except that the prosecuting witness in this case is Irving Wilson. Wilson testified for the state in the first trial.

The defendant sets forth six assignments of error.

He first contends that the court erred in giving the statutory instruction on “weaker and less satisfactory evidence” (OHS 17.250(7)), as the defendant did not testify. The trial court did instruct the jury concerning the burden of proof upon the state to prove…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. O'DonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  2. State v. WillsonOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. Du BoisOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. State of Oregon v. PattonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State v. HollemanOregon Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MainsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. BettsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. WrightNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  4. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. State v. KnissOregon Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API