Legal Opinion
State v. Holleman
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 23, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
(Pro Tempore)
The defendant appeals from a conviction of contributing to the delinquency of a minor.
The charging portion of the indictment is as follows:
“The said BICHARD DENTON HOLLEMAN on the 29th day of January, 1959, in the County of Lane and State of Oregon, then and there being, and one James Michael Glad then and there being a male child under the age of eighteen years, to-wit: seventeen years; said Richard Denton Hollemaa did then and there wilfully do an act, to-wit: did inject into the arm of the said child with needle and syringe certain drugs, to-wit: Sodium Nembutal and Sparine,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. RosserOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. MerloOregon Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Gonzalez-ValenzuelaOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- Rhodes v. HarwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. HollemanOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Rhodes v. HarwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.