Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 7, 1974PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

132 N.J. Super. 130 (1974)

332 A.2d 614

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

SARAH WRIGHT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 10, 1974.

Decided August 7, 1974.

Before Judges LEONARD, ALLCORN and CRAHAY.

Mr. C. Judson Hamlin, First Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant and cross-respondent (Mr. John S. Kulthau, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mrs. Jane G. Kleinfeld, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for defendant-respondent and cross-appellant (Mr. Stanley…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. State v. KociolekSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. State v. WilbelySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. People v. BrommelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ReldanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. State v. ZarinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. State v. M.L.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. State v. SempseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. State v. WrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API