Legal Opinion
State of Oregon v. Patton
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1956PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPerry, J.
The defendant was convicted of armed robbery, and appeals.
The defendant, in effect, offered no evidence, and he states the court erred in instructing the jury as follows:
“Evidence is to be estimated not only by its own intrinsic weight, but also according to the evidence which it is within the power of one side to produce and of the other side to contradict; and if weaker and less satisfactory evidence is offered when it may appear to the jury that stronger and more satisfactory evidence was within the power of the party to produce, then the evidence offered should be viewed by you with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MagersOregon Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. ThomsonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- State of Oregon v. LaneganOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. CuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. CharlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. MainsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BettsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. LakesideOregon Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.