Legal Opinion

Zalta v. Billips

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 1978No. Civ. 51800PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLEMING, Acting P. J. —

Appellants Zalta and Medical Group appeal the dismissal of respondents Billips and others from a pending action for defamation, legal malpractice, and related wrongs.

Appellants’ complaint against respondents arose out of the settlement of an earlier medical malpractice action brought against appellants in which respondent attorneys acted as defense counsel for appellants. In the medical malpractice action, entitled Morales v. Zalta, of which we take judicial notice, Zalta and Medical Group were two of thirteen defendants sued. Respondents were attorneys retained…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Villa v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Schenkel v. MonheitSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Rodriguez v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API