Legal Opinion

Villa v. Cole

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1992No. A053056PublishedCited by 76 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

Robert R. Villa appeals from a judgment entered upon the granting of the motion for summary judgment of respondents Rufus L. Cole and Raymond A. Seeterlin, and from an order granting respondent Cole’s motion to compel production of documents and imposition of sanctions. We affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

This lawsuit arose from an altercation between respondent Seeterlin and appellant Villa, a police officer employed by the City of Alameda (City), that occurred at the time of Villa’s attempt to administer a field sobriety test to the driver of an automobile in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Siebel v. MittlesteadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Pender v. RadinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Cheong Yu Yee v. Don CheungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API