Legal Opinion

Schenkel v. Monheit

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1979No. 1717PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

This complaint in trespass was initiated by appellant, John F. Schenkel, who alleged that appellee, Herbert Monheit, Esq., negligently handled a tort action entrusted to him by appellant. The lower court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment in the instant case, because the court found that appellant was not damaged by appellee’s alleged malpractice. We have reviewed the record and find that the decision of the trial court was justifiable. Therefore, we affirm the lower court’s summary judgment for appellee.

Briefly stated, these are the facts upon which the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Harding v. BellOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Becker v. Julien, Blitz & Schlesinger, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Thompson v. Erving's Hatcheries, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Rizzo v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Bailey v. TuckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. FerrettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API