Legal Opinion

Williams v. Savings & Loan Society

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1893No. 14586PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Action to foreclose a street assessment, made for sewer-work done in the city and county of San Francisco, under the street law of 1885. The appeal is prosecuted from the judgment and order denying a new trial. No demurrer was interposed to the complaint, and the judgment is supported by its allegations.

The contract provided that eight hours should constitute a legal day’s work for all persons employed. The contractor testified that the laborers worked ten hours for a day’s work. The court found that the contractor performed all the conditions of the contract. It is now insisted that a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Brady v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Buckman v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Pacific Paving Co. v. VersoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Flinn v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API