Legal Opinion

Williams v. McDonald

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,623PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in the Third District Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Myrick, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial in a street assessment case. The appellant, Quackenbush, presents three points for our consideration, viz.:

1. The resolution of intention was not signed by the clerk.

Upon this point the testimony of the clerk of the Board of Supervisors was:

“ I have adopted a form for my signature; there is a printed signature adopted by me for all resolutions and orders. The name John A. Bussell is as you see printed at the bottom of the paper. I never actually signed it, but I adopted the printed signature. I always kept…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whiting v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Deady v.TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Weiner v. MullaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Ashwell v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. People v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Ardery v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API