Williams v. McDonald
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial in the Third District Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Thornton, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Myrick, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial in a street assessment case. The appellant, Quackenbush, presents three points for our consideration, viz.:
1. The resolution of intention was not signed by the clerk.
Upon this point the testimony of the clerk of the Board of Supervisors was:
“ I have adopted a form for my signature; there is a printed signature adopted by me for all resolutions and orders. The name John A. Bussell is as you see printed at the bottom of the paper. I never actually signed it, but I adopted the printed signature. I always kept…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Whiting v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Deady v.TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by11 opinions
- Weiner v. MullaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Ashwell v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Labs v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ardery v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.