Avila v. Pleasuretime Soda, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
The “going and coming” provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, § 59-10-12.-12, N.M.S.A. 1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1,1975 Supp.) is the subject matter of this appeal by defendants. The trial court awarded a judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal. We affirm.
Plaintiff was employed by defendant Pleasuretime Soda, Inc. as a manager of a retail soda pop outlet. She opened and closed the business. In addition to her usual duties during regular working hours, plaintiff closed the business and made nightly deposits at a bank every working day. The bank was located at…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schreifer v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- McKinney v. DorlacNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Whitehurst v. Rainbo Baking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Genuine Parts Co. v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Ramirez v. Dawson Production Partners, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- Madrid v. University of CaliforniaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Dupper v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.