Legal Opinion
Madrid v. University of California
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1987No. 16172PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING
WALTERS, Justice.
We granted petitioner’s request for rehearing in this matter. The opinion filed on November 24, 1986 is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.
OPINION
Petitioner, plaintiff in a workman’s compensation case, appealed the trial court’s dismissal of her claim for failure of proof. At her trial plaintiff had called her treating clinical psychologist to testify that her mental disability was work-related. After that testimony had been received but prior to the entry of judgment, the trial court ruled that the psychologist was not qualified to give an opinion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Bettini v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
- Dahl v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Andrus v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Hutchison v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Landers v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Lee v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- Memorial Medical Center, Inc. v. Tatsch Construction, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.