Legal Opinion
McKinney v. Dorlac
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 23, 1944No. 4797PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THREET, Justice.
Appellee, Helen McKinney, filed her suit in the District Court of Bernalillo County, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, to recover compensation for the death of her husband, Arthur McKinney, occurring in an automobile accident near Encino, New Mexico, on August 8, 1941.
The facts, in substance, are as follows:
Prior to August 8, 1941, the deceased, Arthur McKinney, had been employed as a plasterer by appellant H. C. Dorlac off and on for a period of five years. H. C. Dorlac had a sub-contract with the Lembke Construction Company to do a plaster job in Roswell, New Mexico,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Fournier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frederick v. Younger Van LinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
- Edens v. New Mexico Health & Social Services DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Whitehurst v. Rainbo Baking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.