Schreifer v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Applicant David Schreifer sought compensation from his employer, the County of Los Angeles, and its insurer, State Compensation Insurance Fund, for injuries suffered by him as a result of an automobile accident. The referee of the commission found that the accident arose out of the course and scope of the employment. The commission, however, with one of its members dissenting, held that the injuries were not compensable. The problem involved relates to the proper scope of the “special mission” exception to the so-called “going and coming” rule. It is our opinion, that the injuries here…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robinson v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Makins v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Histed v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.