Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Roker
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 19, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 10, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a home health care attendant by a placement agency. The employer telephoned claimant while she was on duty at a client’s residence for the purpose of scheduling a meeting to discuss her lateness for an assignment. Claimant responded with an abusive and obscenity-laden outburst that provoked her discharge. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of KimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of CaraballoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of HartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of RaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Claim of CirlincioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re the Claim of YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013