Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cirlincione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 26, 2004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 6, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as an admissions supervisor for a drug treatment program after she used *718profane language when speaking to a client. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she engaged in misconduct. It is well settled that an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of RomanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of SandersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. In re the Claim of RokerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. In re the Claim of CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re GigiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of RosarioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API