Legal Opinion
State v. Dalbec
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 19, 2010No. A09-1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant Cal Charles Dalbec challenges his conviction for gross misdemeanor domestic assault, Minn.Stat. § 609.2242, subd. 2 (2008), arguing that he was deprived of his right to a fair trial because the district court failed to instruct the jury that it must unanimously agree on the act that constituted the offense.
Because the district court did not plainly err by failing to instruct the jury on the doctrine of specific unanimity, we affirm.
FACTS
During a period of approximately 24 hours spanning November 30 to December 1, 2008, appellant was involved in several…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. VanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. PendletonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. ThaoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Wayne FisherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. PatzoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. InfanteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. LagredCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.