Legal Opinion

State v. Patzold

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 10, 2018No. A17-1549PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The district court then asked each attorney whether there were any objections to the other's closing argument. There were none.

The district court then instructed the jury, repeating the limiting instruction that was given earlier concerning the use of relationship evidence. The jury found appellant guilty of all five charged offenses. The district court sentenced appellant to 187 months in prison on one count of first-degree criminal sexual conduct and one year in prison on each count of domestic assault, to be served consecutively.3

This appeal followed.

ISSUES

I. Did the district court abuse…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. State v. RameySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. MahkukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Minnesota v. David Alan WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State of Minnesota v. Eddie Lee HarperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
  3. State of Minnesota v. Kevin Lee AnthonyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Shawn Eric ClementCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API