American Distilling Co. v. City of Sausalito
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff herein seeks to enjoin an election by defendant City of Sausalito in its attempt to annex an area, including plaintiff’s property, to the municipality. The question of jurisdiction was raised by the court on its own volition. This court being one of limited jurisdiction, the statutory requirements must be shown to exist to enable it to assume jurisdiction.
The bare allegation that plaintiff’s rights arise under the laws and Constitution of the United States does not, of itself, conclude jurisdiction. There must also exist the jurisdictional minimum of $3,030.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Elliott v. Empire Natural Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Royalty Service Corporation v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. v. NattinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Risty v. Chicago, R. I. &. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas H. May and David C. Vigil, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Supreme Court of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. JacobsenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Meek v. City of SacramentoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Dermody v. SmithDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1949
- Thomas H. May and David C. Vigil, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Supreme Court of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974