Legal Opinion

Dermody v. Smith

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided November 23, 1949No. Civ. No. 510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWYGERT, District Judge.

In arriving at a decision in this case the jurisdictional questions raised by the defendants must be treated and disposed of first. If the court does not have jurisdiction, the action must be dismissed without reaching the merits as to whether a permanent injunction should replace the temporary restraining order which was issued on November 15, 1949.

The defendants attack on jurisdiction is based on three grounds. Their contentions are (1) that the requisite jurisdictional amount is not present in this controversy, (2) that the plaintiff has not established diversity of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. PinkstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Local No. 7 Bricklayers', Masons' & Plasterers' International Union v. BowenDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1922
  5. Vicksburg, S. & P. Ry. Co. v. NattinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
  2. Smith v. Monarch Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API