Legal Opinion

Thomas H. May and David C. Vigil, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1974No. 74-1183Published

1Opinion of the Court

508 F.2d 136

Thomas H. MAY and David C. Vigil, for themselves and on

behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellants,

v.

The SUPREME COURT OF the STATE OF COLORADO et al., Appellees.

No. 74-1183.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Argued Nov. 18, 1974.

Decided Dec. 31, 1974.

David C. Vigil, Denver, Colo., for appellants.

Irvin M. Kent, Asst. Atty. Gen. (John P. Moore, Atty. Gen., John E. Bush, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Eugene F. Megyesy, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., with him on the brief), for appellees.

Before LEWIS, Chief Judge, and SETH and BARRETT, Circuit Judges.

SETH, Circuit Judge.

1

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API