Thomas H. May and David C. Vigil, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants filed suit on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated seeking to enjoin the enforcement of Rule 227, Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, and asking a refund of all monies paid by members of the class pursuant to the rule. Rule 227 requires that an annual fee of twenty dollars (five dollars in certain instances) be paid to the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Colorado by each lawyer admitted to practice in the state. The funds so collected are to be used by the Colorado Supreme Court only to “defray the costs of disciplinary administration…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sweezy v. New Hampshire Ex Rel. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boyd v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Snell v. WymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Marcus v. Kansas, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Celli v. ShoellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- D'ADDARIO v. GellerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Celli v. ShoellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Judybill Osceola Enrolled Member of the Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida and All Others Similarly Situated v. Florida Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.