Keehn v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the CourtHorn, J.
Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Statute of Limitations; Breach of Contract; Fifth Amendment Taking; Intellectual Property.
OPINION
FINDINGS OF FACT
Neil F. Keehn, a pro se plaintiff, asserts claims against the United States based on *311thirty-one breaches of implied-in-faet contracts or, in the alternative, thirty-one claims based on the Takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (Supp. V 2011). Plaintiff also alleges that the equitable doctrines of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment provide a…
2Cases cited187 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mercier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- United States Postal Service v. EsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Bondyopadhyay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Golden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- McCaffery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.