Legal Opinion

Keehn v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 1, 2013No. 12-27CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorn, J.

Pro Se Plaintiff; Motion to Dismiss; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Statute of Limitations; Breach of Contract; Fifth Amendment Taking; Intellectual Property.

OPINION

FINDINGS OF FACT

Neil F. Keehn, a pro se plaintiff, asserts claims against the United States based on *311thirty-one breaches of implied-in-faet contracts or, in the alternative, thirty-one claims based on the Takings clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (Supp. V 2011). Plaintiff also alleges that the equitable doctrines of quantum meruit and unjust enrichment provide a…

2Cases cited187 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

182 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mercier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. United States Postal Service v. EsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Bondyopadhyay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
  4. Golden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
  5. McCaffery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API