Legal Opinion
Parker v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 31, 2017No. 16-264CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*6RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Subject Mattel* Jurisdiction; Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted; Pigford Litigation; Section 741; Consent Decree; Equal Credit Opportunity Act; Contractual Takings; Une-nacted Legislation; 2008 Farm Bill
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
- In this case, plaintiff Carl Parker, individually and as administrator for the estate of Gary L, Parker, seeks damages related to (1) the purported failure of the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”) of the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) to abide by the consent decree in the Pigford class-action…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Grant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- ADVANCED ORTHOPEDICS AND SPORTS MEDICINE INSTITUTE v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ALABAMADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- Avalos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Parker v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019