Legal Opinion
Tektel, Incorporated v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 9, 2015No. 11-445CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a); Contract Dispute; Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-22; Savings Clause; Public Contracts Act, Pub.L. No. 111-350 § 7(b); Termination for Convenience Damages.
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This case arises from the termination for convenience of two purchase .orders (“Orders”) issued to Plaintiff Tektel, Inc. (“Tek-tel”) by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (“District Court”) for the installation of telephone equipment and phone maintenance services. Plaintiff seeks $126,409.15 for expenses incurred as a result of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- James M. Ellett Construction Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Lisbon Contractors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Shell Oil Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020