Legal Opinion
United States v. Capital Blue Cross
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 5, 1992No. Civ. A. 1:CV-91-0686PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
Before the court are the cross Motions for Summary Judgment filed by the plaintiff, the United States of America, and by the defendant, Capital Blue Cross (“CBC,” “Blue Cross”). These motions, which address precisely the same issues, are ripe for disposition and will be disposed of simultaneously.
Background
Both parties agree that there are no disputed material facts in the present case, and that summary judgment is the proper device for resolving this dispute.
The core of this matter involves Blue Cross' refusal to reimburse the federal government for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Posadas v. National City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Capital Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993