Legal Opinion
Posadas v. National City Bank
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 6, 1936No. 114PublishedCited by 487 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
The National City Bank of New York is organized under the National-Banking Act, as amended from time to time since its enactment. In 1930 the bank, after complying with the requirements of § 25 of the Federal Reserve Act of December 23, 1913, c. 6, 38 Stat. 251, 273, as amended September 7, 1916, c. 461, 39 Stat. 752, 755, infra, established branches at Manila and Oebu in the Philippine Islands. A tax was levied by and paid to the Philippine Government on the net income of these branches for the first six months of the year 1931 (R. S. § 5219), 1 about which there is no controversy. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- United States v. ClaflinSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by487 opinions
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
482 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.