Legal Opinion

United States v. Blue Cross/blue Shield of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 8, 1993No. 92-6521PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge:

This is one of a number of eases across the country in which the United States seeks to recover from Blue Cross/Blue Shield medical insurance programs for the costs of medical care rendered to veterans in government hospitals. We affirm the district court’s decision to grant the government’s motion for summary judgment, and hold that any provision of the medigap insurance policies issued by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Alabama (Blue Cross) that discriminates against the United States in the payment of benefits is contrary to 38 U.S.C. § 1729.

I

The material facts are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Carter v. South Central BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. C.T. Akins, Jay M. Fate, Michael Schroeder v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Chairman State Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Capital Blue CrossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. State of New Jersey Violent Crimes Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Department of Veterans Affairs v. BoresiSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API