Legal Opinion

Darrow v. Spencer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 1978No. 50170PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

In the Spring of 1975, Dr. Frank E. Darrow and Clary Spencer entered into an oral contract for the sale of hay. Under the terms of the oral contract, upon which both parties agree, Dr. Darrow was to sell Mr. Spencer bales of hay at a $1.50 a bale, each bale to be a “good bale of hay”. It was Mr. Spencer’s understanding that under the terms of the contract, Dr. Darrow had agreed to sell him all the hay grown by the Doctor on his farm during the 1975 season. The Doctor admits the parties discussed the possibility of his selling all the hay grown during the 1975 season, 'but it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lacy v. WozencraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gamble, Simmons & Company v. Kerr-Mcgee CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Potter v. Hatter Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Columbus Trade Exchange, Inc. v. AMCA International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  5. Thomas P. Gibson v. L.D. "Poke" Arnold, Deborah A. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API