Thomas P. Gibson v. L.D. "Poke" Arnold, Deborah A. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
The question presented by this appeal is whether the Oklahoma Statute of Frauds, Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 136, precludes enforcement of an in-court oral settlement agreement involving the transfer of real property, the terms of the settlement agreement having been agreed to at a settlement conference before a magistrate judge. Plaintiff Thomas P. Gibson appeals the district court’s judgment rejecting his breach of contract claim against defendant L.D. “Poke” Arnold. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the parties’ oral agreement is enforceable.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. v. United International Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Flight Systems, Inc. v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Anchorage-Hynning & Co., a District of Columbia Limited Partnership v. Thomas G. MoringielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beaty v. Republic of IraqDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Best View Construction & Development, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- Bird v. WardleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2019
- Musket Corp. v. Star Fuel of Oklahoma, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2013
- Parker v. SoukiDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.