Legal Opinion

Gamble, Simmons & Company v. Kerr-Mcgee Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1999No. 97-6413, 98-6033PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the interpretation of a contract between Appellant, Gamble, Simmons and Company (“Gamble Simmons”) and Appellee, Kerr-McGee Corporation (“Kerr-McGee”), for tax consulting services. Gamble Simmons claims Kerr-McGee undercompensated the company for an audit review it performed and now brings this consolidated appeal challenging the district court’s grant of summary judgment and an award of attorneys’ fees in favor Kerr-McGee. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I. Introduction

Gamble…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lawmaster v. WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Kathy L. Kaul v. Robert T. Stephan, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Max True Plastering Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Mercury Investment Co. v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mata v. SaizCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Ford v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. McInnis v. Fairfield Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Gomes v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API