Legal Opinion
Dee v. Aukerman
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided January 7, 1986No. C-3-84-144PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM CONDITIONALLY OVERRULED; PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT BY JANUARY 17, 1986; DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND REASONABLE EXPENSES OVERRULED
RICE, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a Complaint seeking declaratory, injunctive and other relief against Defendants for the failure of A. Lucille Aukerman, deceased, to name Plaintiff as a joint inventor in a United States patent which Ms. Aukerman obtained in 1969. In response…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Irma Howard v. Samuel Pierce, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and Grand Rapids Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Edwin G. Bemis v. Chevron Research Company, Standard Oil Company of California, and Stanley O. HutchisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Mechmetals Corp. v. Telex Computer Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mechmetals Corp. v. Telex Computer Products, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1981
3Cited by14 opinions
- McV Inc. v. King-Seeley Thermos CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Eldon Industries, Inc. v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Roach v. CrouchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Stark v. Advanced Magnetics, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- FFOC Co. v. Invent A.G.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.