Cochran v. Stein
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Stearns county to recover $867 upon a promissory note. The replies to the separate answers were general denials. The case was tried before Taylor, 3., and a jury which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, he appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.
Action to recover the amount claimed to be due on a negotiable promissory note by an alleged bona fide purchaser thereof. Defense, a denial of the plaintiffs alleged bona fide holdership, and allegations, in substance, that the note was obtained by fraud. The case was tried to a jury, and the defendants had a verdict. This is an appeal from an order denying the plaintiffs motion in the alternative for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
It appeared on the trial that the defendants, on September 16, 1903, executed their negotiable promissory note, dated on that day,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- University of Illinois v. SpaldingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
- Hammond v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Redd v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Morrison v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- McDonough v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- First National Bank v. McNairySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- James v. WarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Noe v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.