Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1912No. Nos. 17,332—(193)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county against defendant doing business under the name of Valley Iron Works, to recover $12,000 for personal injuries. The substance of the complaint and answer is given in the opinion. The reply was a general denial.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for Ramsey county against defendant doing business under the name of Valley Iron Works, to recover $12,000 for personal injuries. The substance of the complaint and answer is given in the opinion. The reply was a general denial. The case was tried before Bunn, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,500. Erom an order denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, Hallam, J., he appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Action for personal injuries, in which plaintiff had a verdict, and *481defendant appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The short facts are as follows: Defendant was engaged in the manufacture and sale of various forms of iron and steel articles of trade, in connection with which he maintained and operated a manufacturing plant, supplied with necessary machinery and appliances, together with a derrick for lifting and moving about the place heavy articles of manufactured material. The derrick was operated by means of a 'lever or crank, by turning which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Neubauer v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  3. Spino v. Butler Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Small v. Brainerd Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Roeder v. North American Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Cochran v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  4. Noe v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Emerson v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API