Noe v. Great Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
William Noe was employed by defendant. He worked with a crew using an Ohio crane which is a movable derrick mounted on a flat car or a turntable so that it can be swung in all directions. It was operated by a steam engine located in a cab on the flat car and by its own power the crane rotated and also the flat car was propelled along the track. The cab was apparently at the back of the derrick arm. When the derrick arm was extended at right angles to the car the cab extended some 6 feet beyond the flat car on the opposite side of the car. The crew was using the crane in the east end of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mantel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Cochran v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Freeberg v. St. Paul Plow-WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Greer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- McDonough v. CameronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Peterson v. Pete-Erickson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Turenne v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Koski v. MuccilliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.