Hammond v. Wolf
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wapello District Court. — Hon. Dell Stuart, Judge. Action to recover an amount alleged to be due on a promissory note. There was a trial to the court, and a judgment in favor of defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
i Appeal* offflirg transsho?£h°and at itw and in equity. I. Judgment was rendered by the district court, and the bill of exceptions was made a part of the record, and filed on the third ^-ay °f December, 1887. The short-hand reporter’s original notes of the testimony taken on the trial were duly certified and filed on the twenty-sixth day of November, 1887, but the translation of the notes was not certified until the seventeenth day of June, 1888, and was not filed until the twenty-eighth day of September, 1888. The notice of appeal was fully served on the twenty-eighth day of May, 1888, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Borland v. WalrathSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Whitaker v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Gardner v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Kavalier v. MachulaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Hill v. HollowaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Toll v. Monitor Binding & Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Ayrhart v. WilhelmySupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Croddy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- State v. WickettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Fleming v. StearnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.