Legal Opinion

United States Distilling Co. v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This prosecution was commenced by the city of Chicago, against the United States Distilling Company, before a justice of the peace, to recover a penalty imposed by that section of the ordinance of March 5, 1883, entitled “Brewers and Distillers, ” which provides that no person, firm or corporation shall carry on or conduct the business of brewer or distiller within the limits of the city of Chicago, without first paying a license therefor in the sum of $500 per annum, under a penalty of not less than $100 nor more than $200 for each and every offence,—meaning thereby, that each brewery and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wiggins Ferry Co. v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Howland v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Carrollton v. BazzetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Condon v. Village of Forest ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State v. DohertyIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
  4. BHA Investments, Inc. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dennehy v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API