BHA Investments, Inc. v. State
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
This case involves the constitutionality of a liquor license transfer fee. When BHA Investments, Inc. (BHA) sold its liquor license, it was required to pay a transfer fee equal to 10% of the sale price to the State of Idaho (the State), pursuant to I.C. § 23-908(5). BHA paid the transfer fee under protest and filed suit in district court against the State, arguing that the transfer fee is a disguised and unconstitutional tax, a taking without just compensation, and an unjust enrichment for the State. The district court dismissed the case, finding no claim upon which relief…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Losser v. BradstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Cramer v. SlaterIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. GiannouliasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Rhoades v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.