Legal Opinion

Wiggins Ferry Co. v. City of East St. Louis

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1882PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of East St. Louis; the Hon. Charles T. Ware, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

The General Assembly, on the 11th day of February, 1853, adopted an act incorporating the Wiggins Ferry Company, at East St. Louis. The charter conferred various, powers, and declared the corporation perpetual. The act authorized the company to exercise all of the powers previously conferred on Samuel Wiggins, with others. A number of persons were named as incorporators, the charter was adopted, and the grant accepted, and the company organized and has ever since exercised its franchises by maintaining and operating ferry boats, as authorized by the charter.

The 54th -section of article 3 of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Woodruff v. ParhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Bessette v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. City of Carrollton v. BazzetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Banta v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API