Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Met-Ed Industrial Users Group v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 7, 2008No. 587 C.D. 2007, 700 C.D. 2007, 701 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge FRIEDMAN.

Met-Ed Industrial Users Group and Pe-nelec Industrial Customer Alliance (together, Customers), Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (together, Utilities) and Irvin A. Po-powsky, Consumer Advocate (OCA 1 ), petition for review of the January 11, 2007, order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC). We affirm.

In April 2006, the Utilities filed with the PUC Petitions for Approval of a Rate Transition Plan. The Customers and the OCA filed Formal Complaints in opposition to certain aspects of the plan, and the PUC ordered that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Chik-Fil-A v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Van Doren v. MazurkiewiczCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. E. Hoffman-Lorah v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Painter v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API