Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 16, 2014No. 13-4288PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

This case requires us to decide the pre-clusive effect of a state utility agency’s ruling, which has been affirmed by Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Court and denied review by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court. Although the Appellants, electric utility companies Metropolitan Edison Co. (“Mei>-Ed”) and Pennsylvania Electric Co. (“Penelec”) (collectively, the “Companies”), also, in effect, invite us to review the agency’s ruling on the merits, we need not and do not take that step.

The Companies’ end-game appears to be to…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Leyse v. Bank of America National Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Secretary United States Department of Labor v. KwasnyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Eugene Frein v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
  4. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Navient CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API