Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 14, 2011No. 532 C.D. 2010, 632 C.D. 2010PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge COHN JUBELIRER.
Before this Court are two consolidated cases involving a March 3, 2010, order (Order) of the Public Utility Commission (Commission). In the first case, (532 C.D. 2010), Metropolitan Edison Company (MetEd) and Pennsylvania Electric Company (Penelec) (together, Companies) petition for review of the Order which rejected the Recommended Decision (RD) of an administrative law judge (ALJ) and denied the Companies’ request to classify “marginal transmission losses” or “line losses” 1 as transmission costs under Companies’ Transmission Service Charge (TSC) Riders so…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Peak v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. ThornburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public UtilitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- American Gas Ass'n v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hiko Energy, LLC v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- HIKO Energy, LLC v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. v. Wrye, N.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.