Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 16, 2014No. 13-4288Published

1Opinion of the Court

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 13-4288 _____________ METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY; PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellants v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION; ROBERT F. POWELSON; JOHN F. COLEMAN, JR.; PAMELA A. WITMER; *GLADYS M. BROWN; JAMES H. CAWLEY, In their Official Capacities as Commissioners of The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission; OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS ADVOCATE; MET-ED INDUSTRIAL USERS GROUP; PENELEC INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER ALLIANCE *(Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2)) _______________ On Appeal from the United States…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  3. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API